Complete tv programm click on download 188 Mb: www.wdr.de Its a mp4 file to play with a free Quick Time Player. (Don’t forget to push the play button). Get quick time free at: www.apple.com
Related posts:
- Test Your Knowledge of Player Nicknames
- Woods faces tricky test at Australian Masters – The Associated Press
- Tiger will face tricky test at the Kingston Heath – The Associated Press
- tiger woods us open 2008 swing analysis
- Forget the Tiger Woods crash: Here’s real golf news that could impact you – Orlando Sentinel
#1 by 203132 on November 3, 2009 - 6:27 am
uberlebenswahrsheinlichkeit….
oh it must suck to german…
#2 by putricio666 on November 3, 2009 - 6:40 am
are you okey?
yes’ i am fine, can some one give me a cup of coffee
#3 by tadi156 on November 3, 2009 - 7:11 am
Golf Rulez !
#4 by intruder2600 on November 3, 2009 - 8:10 am
Force of impact is so strong that there is no safe car for such speed.
#5 by bernsteinrussiaa on November 3, 2009 - 8:24 am
I want to see 100km/h collision of Mercedes-Benz…
#6 by MafiaGENGTEAM1970 on November 3, 2009 - 9:13 am
wow i don’t undrstand what their say
#7 by wesloskii360 on November 3, 2009 - 10:06 am
wow…:O
#8 by MREURONCAP on November 3, 2009 - 10:35 am
Well, now imagine a 3 star car!! or even a 4?! Even more, imagine a VW Käfer (Old Beetle) or a Golf MkII
#9 by MREURONCAP on November 3, 2009 - 10:49 am
Yes, its called the … gun man? i cant remember, but there is one that could survive higher G forces!
#10 by iceboys on November 3, 2009 - 10:53 am
no 100 kmh
80 kmh
#11 by Rezessionsmottenkist on November 3, 2009 - 11:14 am
The test was undertaken in 2007, not in 2008, for german scientific TV-magazine `Quarks`(West German Radio&TV Broadcasting, WDR).
The crash-expert from Switzerland (by the way this gentleman looks quite similar to banking-mobster Ackermann and has a similar sounding voice, too) says loads on the passengers may have reached a peak beyond 150-200 G (!) in this kind of accident.
Hence, passengers would have got flatly killed in this accident.
#12 by Rezessionsmottenkist on November 3, 2009 - 11:36 am
The german comment says:
a) Body structure of the Golf very well built& extremely stable, even the fire fighters` hydraulical claws had troubles to cut off the A- and B-pillars.
b) But restraint-systems do not yet live up to the quality of the body structure, albeit them being perfectly up to date by todays`standards.
Given the excessive speed,the head of the dummy smashes through the(inflated) airbag,hitting the rigid structure of the steering wheel.Loads on the passengers are a deadly +60G.
#13 by ashjohnsonsen on November 3, 2009 - 12:02 pm
english please
#14 by blower069 on November 3, 2009 - 12:22 pm
what the hell?
@ 1:29 you can see that the front wheel is not spinning?? :S
#15 by chustron on November 3, 2009 - 12:46 pm
Me refiero al tipo de proteccion de barras antivuelco como los que llevan los WRC y los anclajes también del asiento, si no, porqué los hacen así?
#16 by modding69 on November 3, 2009 - 12:53 pm
no one survived at 60 G.
#17 by stonee206 on November 3, 2009 - 1:40 pm
That is really not bad!!
#18 by malditonissan on November 3, 2009 - 2:30 pm
Quede helado con el video :S
#19 by tuerestu on November 3, 2009 - 2:47 pm
pues sí, a lo mejor esa es la solución, poner refuerzos en la cabina como los coches de rally y que el morro se siga deformando como ahora.
#20 by legacyrally555 on November 3, 2009 - 3:41 pm
mmm pero si se deforma el Habitaculo conviertes a los que quieres salvar en Tartara… la idea es preservar la cabina y tener un espacio de absorcion delante y atras… ha sido buena formula ya vez que antes si que te matabas en un Auto asi fuera a 40 KPH
#21 by legacyrally555 on November 3, 2009 - 4:06 pm
Estoy de acuerdo con que darse en un auto a 100 KMH no es ninguna gracia… pero tengo mas fe en la resistencia del cuerpo humano un Piloto en un F16 Se eyecta a la velocidad del sonido y se quebra un par de costillas… pero VIVE ¿porque no se habria de resistir en un auto Con buena seguridad+cinturon un golpe en seco a 100 Por hora?? si resistimos una Eyeccion de Avion…
#22 by dalealcorte on November 3, 2009 - 4:36 pm
Se supone que lo del video es un bloque deformable de aluminio, sobre un bloque fijo de hormigón. Simula ser un vehículo de igual masa y tamaño en dirección contraria, igual que en la EuroNCAP
Saludos
#23 by VK2008Benidorm on November 3, 2009 - 4:54 pm
Lo que falta aqui es una explicacion de que la energia cinetica que se absorve en un choque no es lineal, sino cuadratica ya que energia = 1/2 * masa * velocidad al cuadrado.
Un 50% mas de velocidad es un 125% mas de energia a absorver…
#24 by KunthCupana on November 3, 2009 - 5:05 pm
Por no hablar de que encima, te estas cargando al tipo contra el que te la pegas, ya ves tu….
#25 by justinc100194 on November 3, 2009 - 5:06 pm
talk english bitch